/** Tools */

18 August 2005

An Open Letter to the British Media

The Antagonist has received a copy of an email sent today by Bridget Dunne to the editors of numerous media organisations in the UK including the BBC, Guardian, Independent and others.

The Antagonist is republishing the letter here, in full, for anyone else that also wishes to take the editors of the media institutions that have allowed the lies surrounding the murder of innocent Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes to continue, without question, until the timely leak of documents that exposed the lies for what they were.

If readers feel motivated enough to contact the media institutions for themselves, please feel free to post the responses and findings of your efforts in the comments to this post.

There is much unrest in the den of snakes. The time is now.

Bridget's open letter to the media, in full:

Now that some of the facts are emerging into the events that led to the assassination of Jean Charles de Menezes, we can start to ask similar questions about the events in London on the 7th and 21st July.

The paucity of evidence from 7th July, one CCTV image from Luton station and supposed discovery of personal documents at all of the sites, has been allowed to go unchallenged by the main stream media.

I have had a fruitless search for any further evidence, such as, what times did these trains leave Kings Cross? One small simple fact that would have aided in any genuine investigation and appeal for witnesses.

Was it just a coincidence that Peter Power of Visor Consultants conducted a security drill using those exact locations on the morning of 7th July (Radio 5 live). I have seen no interviews asking him about this, yet he has appeared at least twice on BBC's Newsnight to offer up his opinion on locking up suspects without charge for up to 3 months. Why?

If lies have been told about one event why should we believe anything else that we have been told? Just to remind those in power, you can fool some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time.

We need to start asking these questions,

Yours Faithfully

Ms Bridget Dunne

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Was it just a coincidence that Peter Power of Visor Consultants conducted a security drill using those exact locations on the morning of 7th July (Radio 5 live).

When you say "those locations" you do of course mean "two of the four" bombing locations.

As stated by Peter in his response to speculation about this over a month ago, those locations were among several chosen as the most likely targets for bombing attacks. Their likelyhood as targets was pretty much dictated by recent television specials.

I have seen no interviews asking him about this, yet he has appeared at least twice on BBC's Newsnight to offer up his opinion on locking up suspects without charge for up to 3 months. Why?

He is often interviewed in relation to terrorism and security matters as it is his business to consult in this field.

If you mean why aren't reporters asking him about his business crisis planning sessions and in particular the one held on 7/7 it is probably because these are reputable news sites and checked that story out by 8/7. It is now 19/8.

If you were unaware that you are asking this man to be asked questions he answered over a month ago because you read on a website those questions were unanswered, obviously you should stop reading that website. It is concerned with promoting myth rather than reality.

The Antagonist said...

That Peter Power was asked questions about his little game of 1,000 players on the morning of 7/7 is one thing.

Whether he answered them in a manner appropriate for his presence/prescience in events that launched an international terrorist manhunt, is quite another.

Bridhet Dunne said...

I wonder if anonymous might like to tell us which "two of the four" bombing locations his drill covered?

Anonymous said...

Quote: That Peter Power was asked questions about his little game of 1,000 players on the morning of 7/7 is one thing.

Whether he answered them in a manner appropriate for his presence/prescience in events that launched an international terrorist manhunt, is quite another.


As is presenting this request as though these questions have not already been addressed and the orignal story declared a non-event.

---

Quote: I wonder if anonymous might like to tell us which "two of the four" bombing locations his drill covered?

I would have absolutely no interest in looking this up unless I had a reason to.

Can you tell me what conceivable purpose it would serve to know this ?

Just a refresher on what it is we are talking about here:

HOST: HOST: To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?

POWERS: Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.
Precisely, and it was about half past nine this morning, we planned this for a company and for obvious reasons I don't want to reveal their name but they're listening and they'll know it. And we had a room full of crisis managers for the first time they'd met and so within five minutes we made a pretty rapid decision that this is the real one and so we went through the correct drills of activating crisis management procedures to jump from slow time to quick time thinking and so on.


So a bunch of executives were sitting in an office of a bulding on the morning of the London blasts. They were having a crisis planning meeting with Visor consultants who consult for businesses who wish to be able to deal with adverse conditions. When they found out about the attacks 40mins after the event that the blasts had happened the hypothetical scenario they were planning to deal with turned into a real one.

So tell me what relevance you think there is in the specifics of the hypothetical scenario these executives were discussing.

Tell me why specifically which two of the three stations actually bombed which were mirrored in the crisis plan makes any difference.
Then how the other two which did not match do not.
Then I might see at least some reason to go look this up. Right now all I've got is:
www.youremissingthepoint.com

The Antagonist said...

Declared a non-event by whom, exactly?

And what, pray tell, is the point of a room full of crisis managers on the day of a 1,000 player anti-terrorist rehearsal operation if not to manage a 1,000 player anti-terrorist rehearsal operation?

Of course there was a room full of crisis managers, they were managing a crisis involving a 1,000 players.

That you need even ask, "Tell me what relevance you think there is in the specifics of the hypothetical scenario these executives were discussing," would also explain how you managed to find www.youremissingthepoint.com before anyone else here.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if that was supposed to be a smart comment but you basically just said I am missing the point and you don't have one.

So you are already aware that:
1. This was a hypothetical scenario,
2. This consulting is a common business practice,
3. There is nothing suggesting that this was related to the bombings,
4. Powers has already clarified all this,

Unless you are holding out for some journalist to nail down the favourite colour of each executive present at that meeting one wonders what "big question" you think remains unanswered.

Make it a good one too, because right now you look like you are just in the business of promoting paranoid fantasies of conspiracies you already know are debunked.

Draco_mad said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The Antagonist said...

Quoting from an Anonymous comment removed for containing more inflammatory nonsense than previous Anonymous comments:

Meanwhile I appear to be the only person interested in providing Mrs Dunne with publically available answers to her public call for answers...

Go on then, provide some 'publically available answers'.

Anonymous said...

My god it's like the Twilight Zone for the retarded. Did you just ask me to produce a link to this page ?

What happens if I don't provide it ? Do you come back here, scroll past the discussion we already had and resolved on this topic and find that I haven't given you a link to the page you are already on ?

LMAO. You know what... I'm gonna hold out. Youre gonna have to beg me to tell you what I already told you about Operation Goldfish.