/** Tools */

23 November 2010

Can you tell what it is yet? [1984 Version]

Factoring this trusty little quote from the MoD in to the equation:
The Middle Class Proletariat
The middle classes could become a revolutionary class, taking the role envisaged for the proletariat by Marx. The globalization of labour markets and reducing levels of national welfare provision and employment could reduce peoples’ attachment to particular states. The growing gap between themselves and a small number of highly visible super-rich individuals might fuel disillusion with meritocracy, while the growing urban under-classes are likely to pose an increasing threat to social order and stability, as the burden of acquired debt and the failure of pension provision begins to bite. Faced by these twin challenges, the world’s middle-classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest.
Who would ever suspect that the story behind a nice gentle headline such as NUS starts campaign to oust leading Lib Dems might contain a confirmation of the State's virtually tacit declaration of war on anyone with half a conscience? Probably not many - but it does.
As police face continued criticism for failing to control the march, the Observer has learned that defence firms are working closely with UK armed forces and contemplating a "militarisation" strategy to counter the threat of civil disorder.

The trade group representing the military and security industry says firms are in negotiation with senior officers over possible orders for armoured vehicles, body scanners and better surveillance equipment.

The move coincides with government-backed attempts to introduce the use of unmanned spy drones throughout UK airspace, facilitating an expansion of covert surveillance that could provide intelligence on future demonstrations.

Derek Marshall, of the trade body Aerospace, Defence and Security (ADS), said that such drones could eventually replace police helicopters.

He added that military manufacturers had discussed police procurement policies with the government, as forces look to counter an identified threat of civil disobedience from political extremists.

Meanwhile police sources say they have detected an increase in the criminal intentions of political extremists and are monitoring "extreme leftwing activity" in light of last week's student protest.

The office of the National Co-ordinator for Domestic Extremism (NCDE) said it was feeding information to Scotland Yard's National Public Order Intelligence Unit, which holds a database of protest groups. NCDE, which in turn works closely with the Confidential Intelligence Unit that monitors political groups throughout the UK, said it had already recorded a rise in politically motivated disorder.

Delightful to learn that these private military corporations have identified the general public as their new targets, an added bonus that State officials think so too. More wonderful still to learn of the rapidity with which "senior officers", such as the lovely fellows of the Association of Chief Police Officers, have tendered a sympathetic ear or two.

The police even shut down a web site -- which sort of backfired somewhat, what with the Internet being the way it is for now -- but it's very important everyone remembers that censorship only takes place in China or Iran, and probably Somalia too. That'd never happen here.

Not long ago, you'd have been a 'conspiracy theorist' if you thought there was the remotest possibility of the State censoring web sites or arming itself in earnest against the people that happen to live under its jurisdication.

It might be fascism, but is it still a 'conspiracy theory'?

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sounds like the wet dream that Thatcher is clinging to for dear life

stef said...

THATCHER GAINING STRENGTH FROM NATION'S MISERY

The Antagonist said...

You have to hand it to the Mash, they're on the mark a lot of the time.

I think the old moo is in the process of reincarnating.

The Antagonist said...

In an article titled Sir Ian, put away your megaphone and subtitled Politicians, not the police, should call the shots on crime and terror written by Hugh Muir, the following line can be found:

"We could accede to the demands of the security and policing lobby for more control orders, more immigration checks, more intrusive documentation and a lower burden of proof and still find ourselves unable to stop some lunatic taking a rucksack full of explosives on to the tube during rush hour."

Which, given the events of 7/7 would seem to be a not entirely unreasonable statement.

Except for the fact that the article was written some three whole months before 7/7 and published on Tuesday 19 April 2005.

Prescient, or what?

Anonymous said...

"...at the request of the Met's Police Central e-Crime Unit (PCeU), Nominet revoked the domain names of 1,200 websites... Plans for more such action, which was taken without any court oversight, are likely to raise concerns over the potential for increased censorship online."

Police to get greater web censorship powers • The Register

International: Cyber cops want stronger domain rules • The Register

Anonymous said...

"...at the request of the Met's Police Central e-Crime Unit (PCeU), Nominet revoked the domain names of 1,200 websites... Plans for more such action, which was taken without any court oversight, are likely to raise concerns over the potential for increased censorship online."

Police to get greater web censorship powers • The Register

International: Cyber cops want stronger domain rules • The Register

paul said...


Except for the fact that the article was written some three whole months before 7/7 and published on Tuesday 19 April 2005.

Holy Fuck

The Antagonist said...

Five years on and the story is still full of little surprises like that.

It could be argued that he'd watched Panorama's London Under Attack, but that didn't feature suicide bombers or rucksacks.

Maybe he took Panorama and added a bit of Madrid into the mix.