"When injustice becomes law,
resistance becomes duty."
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!" -- Mario Savio
It has to start somewhere. It has to start sometime. What better place than here? What better time than now?
Welcome to Anything that defies my sense of reason.... Class antagonism of a New World Order.
....because words will always retain their power, offer the means to meaning and, for those who'll listen, the enunciation of truth, and because being sleepwalked into fascism is not an option.
To confront ideas that radically alter our perception of the world is one of life's most unsettling yet liberating experiences.
Throw away your ambitions for membership to the socially acceptable position of wage slave.
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; the right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers." -- Article 19
Well, not quite a suicide bomber video, but he's been dead four years and is looking and sounding better than ever.
*** NEW BLOG: Class Antagonism of a New World Order ***
Proud member of the Conspiraloon™ Alliance, because 'stochastic theory' just doesn't cut it:
"We'll keep on fighting - and we'll win!"
Thanks to the Conspiraloon™ Alliance laboratories, you can now Ruin Those You Resent without leaving your personal computer!
"The country's biggest force, the Metropolitan police || believe that large sections of the population have become increasingly politicised, and there is a growing sense that the current restrictions on demonstrations are too light." - The Guardian
"The bombers scattered identity and bank cards around the Tube carriages they targeted before placing their rucksacks on the floor and setting off the explosives. || Although they were damaged to some extent, they [the ID and bank cards] did not show the damage that would be expected if they were on the body of the bomber or in the rucksack, suggesting that in each case they had been deliberately separated by some distance from the actual explosion. || The bombers were not wearing the rucksacks at the time of the explosions, but had instead put them down on the floor of the bus and Tube trains." - The Telegraph
"But it [de Menezes execution MPS trial] was nearly derailed after an armed police raid on the home of a juror's ex-boyfriend in the second week of the case, in which the female juror's baby was taken away." - Daily Mail
"It is no exaggeration to say that at the time of the arrest there was not one shred of admissible evidence against Barot. The arrest was perfectly lawful - there were more than sufficient grounds, but in terms of evidence to put before a court, there was nothing. There then began the race against time to retrieve evidence from the mass of computers and other IT equipment that we seized. It was only at the very end of the permitted period of detention that sufficient evidence was found to justify charges. I know that some in the media were sharpening their pencils, and that if we had been unable to bring charges in that case, there would have been a wave of criticism about the arrests. Barot himself of course eventually pleaded guilty last year and received a 40-year sentence." – DAC Peter Clarke
The 7/7 narrative: "06.49: The 4 men .... each put on rucksacks || 07:14: .... The 4 then put on their rucksacks...." More....
"The [21/7] jury were told a further charge of conspiracy to cause explosions likely to endanger life, faced by each man, was now being left off the indictment." – BBC
"Tony Blair and his family suffered the indignity of having to sleep on the floor and eat an Indian takeaway out of foil cartons on their last night in Downing Street, insiders have revealed." – The Times
Posts
12 comments:
Brilliant!
The wonders of modern technology.
Who'd have thunk it?
"Archive footage", "shots of a body-double", and "spoken by a sound-alike". Simple!
Oh yes, very good
I've always been suspicious about what isn't said on those 'confession' videos and am not sure that there's any need to invoke technical trickery. This does, however, show what is possible
Whatever next, eh?
Maybe we'll see Gene Kelly breakdancing in the rain, or maybe even dancing cars....
Stef said...
"Oh yes, very good
I've always been suspicious about what isn't said on those 'confession' videos..."
yeah, same here, what they say is as far as i can tell nothing whatsoever to do with suicide bombings, it is almost what one might expect to say if one were part of some sort of 'able danger' style exercise and had been asked to do a video to 'get into the role'
i'm sorry, that probably sounds a bit loony
@jon
Nope, I don't think so.
There are no specifics mentioned. At the very least, their content has been over sold
As has the practice of labelling anyone who questions our government as being insane
I've always been suspicious about what isn't said on those 'confession' videos
What isn't said? Such as:
- No mention of London
- No mention of the Underground
- No mention of buses
- No mention of suicide bombing
- No mention of bombing
In fact, no mention at all of anything vaguely related to what is alleged to have happened on 7th July 2005.
That sort of thing, you mean?
And, while we're on the subject, let's assume that the so-called ‘suicide’ videos of Khan and Tanweer are bona fide. If this happens to be the case, neither would not stand up in a court of law as proof of anything which, surely, is the most basic test that they should pass if they are to carry any weight at all.
It is also important to note that Khan’s video was released in response to a wealth of questioning by the media, citing senior police and investigative sources, about the veracity of the notion that suicide bombers perpetrated 7/7 when, clearly, there was no reason for any of the perpetrators to have died in such an attack.
The 'Khan video' materialised on 1st September 2005 and effectively called an abrupt halt to such questioning, even though it is absent of any reference to a suicide attack on London.
Similarly, the 'Tanweer video' materialised on the eve of the first anniversary of 7/7 –- and one has to marvel at the timing, PR and marketing capabilities the so-called Al Qaeda media wing -- just in case anyone still had any doubt about what the official story was. Again, this video lacked any references to an attack on London and would not stand up in a court of law as proof of anything.
The amazing irony is *everyone* knows what happened on 7/7, except those who have been researching what happened since the day it happened.
That sort of thing, you mean?
Um, yes
That sort of thing, you mean?
Um, yes
Thought as much. But is it only thee and me, and of course the valued members of Conspiraloon™ Alliance, that have noticed though?
"If this happens to be the case, neither would not stand up in a court of law as proof of anything which, surely, is the most basic test that they should pass if they are to carry any weight at all."
Almost word for word what I said to Darshna Soni during the Channel 4 News piece, but like a lot of what I said, it never made the final cut.
It's very hard to get such heretical facts out through the MSM.
Post a Comment